Radioactive dating art forgeries dating david eads joplin mo

To prove his point, Van Meegeren began, while in prison, to forge the Vermeer painting “Jesus Amongst the Doctors” to demonstrate to the skeptics just how good a forger of Vermeer he was.The work was completed when Van Meegeren learned that a charge of forgery had been substituted for that of collaboration.

radioactive dating art forgeries-57radioactive dating art forgeries-83

Radioactive dating art forgeries

Moreover, he stated that this painting and the very famous and beautiful “Disciples at Emmaus”, as well as four other presumed Vermeers and two de Hooghs (a 17th century Dutch painter) were his own work.

Many people, however, thought that Van Meegeren was only lying to save himself from the charge of treason.

The physicist Rutherford and his colleagues showed that the atoms of certain “radioactive” elements are unstable and that within a given time period a fixed proportion of the atoms spontaneously disintegrates to form atoms of a new element.

Because radioactivity is a property of the atom, Rutherford showed that the radioactivity of a substance is directly proportional to the number of atoms of the substance present.

He, therefore, refused to finish and age the painting so that hopefully investigators would not uncover his secret of aging his forgeries.

To settle the question an international panel of distinguished chemists, physicists and art historians was appointed to investigate the matter.

Now, Van Meegeren was well aware of these materials.

To avoid detection, he scraped the paint from old paintings that were not worth much, just to get the canvas, and he tried to use pigments that Vermeer would have used.

The panel took x-rays of the paintings to determine whether other paintings were underneath them.

In addition, they analyzed the pigments (coloring material) used in the paint, and examined the paintings for certain signs of old age.

Bredius and was bought by the Rembrandt Society for 0,000.

Tags: , ,